Click for the Most Current Safety Alerts

Safety Alert Archives:


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note From Jay Jamali: Miller has announced a recall of their shadow beam anchor used for fall protection. Please refer to the Recall Information listed Below. You can also download the Miller recall sheet (PDF Format) for pictures about the items covered in the Miller recall notice. An alternative for the recalled item from another manufacturer can be found by Clicking Here

Stop Use and Return Notice Immediate Attention Required Please read, review and follow the instructions in this notice carefully.

In an on-going effort to ensure that Miller offers the safest fall protection products in the industry, we thoroughly investigated an issue reported by one end-user involving the Miller 8814-12 Shadow Beam Anchor. It is important to note that no fall or injury was involved with this report. Our findings reveal that the plunger pin assembly can be damaged under certain conditions. As a result, the service-life of the product could be compromised and the problem could be difficult to find through an end-user inspection. Although there have not been any injuries or accidents related to this product, our highest priority is the safety of our customers. Given that, we have decided that all Miller 8814-12 and 8814-24 Beam Anchors with the dates of manufacture specified below must be brought into our facility to be evaluated and retrofitted or replaced as necessary.Products Included in this Notice: Miller 8814-12, 8814-24 and 040114 Shadow Beam AnchorsManufacture Dates: November 14, 2002 – December 10, 2004 As indicated above, this notice only affects the model numbers listed above manufactured within the specified dates. All other models including the 8811, 8812, 8813, 8815 and 8816 Series are not affected by this notice. Please take the following steps immediately:

  • Remove from service all 8814-12 and 8814-24 beam anchors manufactured between November 14, 2002 and December 10, 2004. The date of manufacture is located on the product label. If the label is missing or the print is illegible, compare the product with the pictures attached to determine if the unit should be sent in to be retrofitted. Contact Miller Fall Protection's Customer Service Department at 800-873-5242 for a Returned Goods Authorization (RGA) number.  
  • Package and ship the product along with the RGA information.

The returned product will be inspected and retrofitted or replaced as required. All reasonable efforts will be made to return the retrofitted product or a replacement product to you within three working days. To help compensate for the inconvenience, we will replace any other parts on the beam anchor that are excessively worn due to normal use as well as clean the units for you.

Top


1.1. DOT requires that by September 25, 2003, each person who offers for transportation in commerce or transports in commerce one or more of the following hazardous materials must develop and adhere to a security plan for hazardous materials:

1.1.1. A highway route-controlled quantity of a Class 7 (radioactive) material, as defined in 49CFR173.403, in a motor vehicle, rail car, or freight container;1.1.2. More than 25 kg (55 pounds) of a Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 (explosive) material in a motor vehicle, rail car, or freight container;1.1.3. More than one L (1.06 qt) per package of a material poisonous by inhalation, as defined in 49CFR171.8, that meets the criteria for Hazard Zone A, as specified in 49CFR173.116(a) or 173.133(a);1.1.4. A shipment of a quantity of hazardous materials in a bulk packaging having a capacity equal to or greater than 13,248 L (3,500 gallons) for liquids or gases or more than 13.24 cubic meters (468 cubic feet) for solids;1.1.5. A shipment in other than a bulk packaging of 2,268 kg (5,000 pounds) gross weight or more of one class of hazardous materials for which placarding of a vehicle, rail car, or freight container is required for that class under the provisions of subpart F.1.1.6. A select agent or toxin regulated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under 42 CFR part 73; or1.1.7. A quantity of hazardous material that requires placarding under the provisions of subpart F.The training requirements are as follows:1.1. By December 22, 2003 DOT requires each hazmat employee to receive In-depth Hazmat Security (IHS) training concerning the security plan and its implementation if a hazmat security plan is required for the employer.1.1.1. New hazmat employees must receive IHS training within 90 days after employment.1.2. The IHS training must include:1.2.1. Company security objectives,1.2.2. Specific security procedures,1.2.3. Employee responsibilities,1.2.4. Actions to take in the event of a security breach,1.2.5. The organizational security structure.1.3. Hazmat employees at facilities that are not required to generate a HSP are required to receive Hazmat Security Awareness Level (HSAL) training:1.3.1. Within 90 days of hire1.3.2. During the first scheduled 3 year refresher training1.3.3. At the latest by March 24, 2006.1.4. The HSAL training must include:1.4.1. Security risks associated with hazardous materials transportation,1.4.2. Methods designed to enhance transportation security and1.4.3. How to recognize and respond to possible security threats1.5. The training shall be conducted in a manner that is understandable to the employee.1.6. Refresher hazmat security training shall be provided every three years, and when the following situations occur:1.7.1. Changes in the HSP render previous training obsolete;

1.7.2. Inadequacies in the employee's knowledge of the HSP indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or Any other situation arises in which retraining appears necessary to ensure the security of hazardous materials.

Top


 

Alert release - July 31, 2003

It has come to our attention that some of our clients may not be aware of the new Department Of Transportation (DOT) regulatory requirements that goes into effect September 25, 2003.49CFR172.800" Each person who offers for transportation or transports one or more of the following hazardous materials must develop and adhere to a security plan for hazardous materials that conforms to the requirements of this subpart:

(1) A highway route-controlled quantity of a Class 7 (radioactive) material, as defined in § 173.403 of this subchapter, in a motor vehicle, rail car, or freight container;(2) More than 25 kg (55 pounds) of a Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 (explosive) material in a motor vehicle, rail car, or freight container;(3) More than one L (1.06 qt) per package of a material poisonous by inhalation, as defined in § 171.8 of this subchapter, that meets the criteria for Hazard Zone A, as specified in § § 173.116(a)or 173.133(a) of this subchapter; (4) A shipment of a quantity of hazardous materials in a bulk packaging having a capacity equal to or greater than 13,248 L (3,500 gallons) for liquids or gases or more than 13.24 cubic meters (468 cubic feet) for solids; (5) A shipment in other than a bulk packaging of 2,268 kg (5,000 pounds) gross weight or more of one class of hazardous materials for which placarding of a vehicle, rail car, or freight container is required for that class under the provisions of subpart F of this part;(6) A select agent or toxin regulated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under 42 CFR part 73; or

(7) A quantity of hazardous material that requires placarding under the provisions of subpart F of this part.

§ 172.802 At a minimum, a security plan must include the following elements:

  • Personnel security.Unauthorized access.
  • En route security.

The security plan must be in writing and must be retained for as long as it remains in effect. Copies of the security plan, or portions thereof, must be available to the employees who are responsible for implementing it, consistent with personnel security clearance or background investigation restrictions and a demonstrated need to know. The security plan must be revised and updated as necessary to reflect changing circumstances. When the security plan is updated or revised, all copies of the plan must be maintained as of the date of the most recent revision."Enviro Safetech can assist in determining if this requirement applies to your operation and develop the written security plan, as well as provide DOT HM-126 or 181 training.

Jay Jamali, CSP, CHMM, CHCMEHS Director, Enviro Safetech Inc.jayjam@envirosafetech.com

T: 408-941-9393

Top


 

OSHA STEEL ERECTION STANDARD TAKES EFFECT

The nation's iron workers have enhanced workplace safety protections as a result of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's new steel erection standard, which goes into effect 1/18/02.This regulation will help prevent many of the 2,300 unnecessary injuries and 35 fatalities that occur in this industry every year. Developed in conjunction with industry and union groups, the new rule is expected to save employers nearly $40 million a year.

The new standard improves protection to iron workers by placing special emphasis on the most serious hazards in the steel erection industry. These include hazards associated with working under loads; hoisting, landing and placing decking; column stability; double connections; landing and placing steel joists, and falls to lower levels.

Although the new steel erection requirements are now in effect, OSHA will not conduct general schedule inspections for 60 days, until March 19, 2002. During this period, the agency will emphasize outreach and education to assist the industry in training employees on the new requirements.
For more info go to: http://www.osha-slc.gov/steelerection/
For the draft compliance directive http://www.osha-slc.gov/doc/steelerection/steelerection-memo.html


 

Highlights of OSHA's Recordkeeping Rule

1-The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires employers to log occupational injuries and illnesses.

A-This regulation affects approximately 1.4 million establishments.
B-A number of specific industries in the retail, service, finance, insurance, and real estate sectors that are classified as low hazard are exempt from most requirements of the rule as are small businesses with 10 or fewer employees.

2-The above requirement has been revised and takes effect January 1, 2002, except for provisions covering hearing loss and musculoskeletal disorders, which OSHA is delaying for 1 year - until January 1, 2003.

3-The following is a brief summary of key provisions of the rule.

A-The OSHA 200 log and 101 form have been replaced by OSHA Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses); simplified and printed on smaller, legal size paper; OSHA Form 301 (Injury and Illness Incident Report); includes more data about how the injury or illness occurred; OSHA Form 300A (Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses); a new form created to make it easier to post and calculate incidence rates.
B-Provides a single set of recording criteria for both work-related injuries and work-related illnesses. (The former rule required employers to record all illnesses, regardless of severity.)
C-Includes new definitions of medical treatment, first aid, and restricted work to simplify recording decisions.
D-Requires a significant degree of aggravation before a preexisting injury or illness is considered work related.
E-Adds further exceptions to the definition of work-relatedness to limit recording of cases involving eating and drinking of food and beverages, common colds and flu, blood donations, exercise programs, mental illnesses, etc.
F-Clarifies the recording of "light duty" or restricted work cases. Requires employers to record cases when the injured or ill employee is restricted from "routine job functions," which are defined as work activities the employee regularly performs at least once weekly.
G-Requires employers to record all needlestick and sharps injuries involving contamination by another person's blood or other potentially infectious materials.
H-Includes separate provisions describing the recording criteria for cases involving the work-related transmission of tuberculosis.
I-Eliminates the term "lost workdays" and requires recording of days away from work or days restricted or days transferred to another job.
J-Calls for employers to count calendar days rather than workdays.
K-Requires employers to establish a procedure for employees to report injuries and illnesses and tell their employees how to report.
L-Employers are prohibited from discriminating against employees who do report injuries and illnesses.
M-For the first time, employees and former employees will be guaranteed access to their individual OSHA 301 forms.
N-Employee representatives will be provided access to the "information about the case" section of the OSHA 301 form in establishments where they represent employees.
O-Protects employee privacy by prohibiting employers from entering an individual's name on Form 300 for certain types of injuries or illnesses (e.g., sexual assaults, HIV infections, mental illnesses);
P-Requires the annual summary to be posted for 3 months instead of 1.
Q-Requires certification of the summary by a company executive.
R-Excludes some public transportation and motor vehicle accidents from the reporting of fatalities.

4-States that operate their own job safety and health programs will be adopting comparable recordkeeping rules that will also be effective January 1, 2002.

A-States must have the same requirements for which injuries and illnesses are recordable and how they are recorded.
B-However, other provisions, such as industry exemptions, may be different as long as they are as stringent as the federal requirements.

5-All of the above mentioned forms can be downloaded from WWW.OSHA .GOV or your state OSHA web site.

A-California state specific information is available at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DOSH/DoshReg/emprecPropReg.html

6-This information has been provided by Jay Jamali, CSP, CHMM, CHCM who is the Environmental Health and Safety Director for Enviro Safetech Incorporated. Mr. Jamali is considered to be an expert in OSHA compliance and a lecturer for the University of California safety management certificate program.


MSA ANNOUNCES Stop Use & Recall Notice for Sure-Stop Shock Absorbers

Concerning MSA Surety Sure-Stop Shock Absorbers and fall protection systems using the Sure -Stop shock absorber Manufactured from May through October of 2001/MSA is currently investigating a reported incident involving an MSA Surety Sure-Stop lanyard. Their initial findings revealed that the lanyard was improperly manufactured. Although it appeared to be functional, it provided no fall arrest protection to the user. This notice is directed to all purchasers of products that potentially could also contain this manufacturing error.MSA asks that you carefully review this notice and immediately remove from service all affected fall protection components such as:MSA Surety Sure-Stop lanyardsMSA Surety Gravity harnesses with integral Sure-Stop shock absorbersMSA Surety Sure-Grab rope grab/fall arresterCertain kits containing the MSA Surety Sure-Stop shock absorberFor more info Click to Visit the MSA Website.

To download a PDF document of the Recall Click Here

Top


New OSHA, Joint Commission Agreement Expected to Enhance Healthcare Compliance

An education partnership agreement renewed OSHA and JCAHO will help healthcare organizations meet JCAHO accreditation expectations and comply with OSHA regulations. The educational aspect of the partnership is expected to improve efficiency and reduce duplication in oversight activities.The JCAHO-OSHA partnership was first established in 1996. The not-for-profit independent commission evaluates and accredits nearly 20,000 health care organizations and programs in the U.S.

  • Among plans for the continued collaboration are to: Develop additional educational programs that will help organizations maintain their JCAHO accreditation while meeting OSHA regulations; Make OSHA's Voluntary Protection Program ­ which recognizes excellence in occupational safety and health programming and exempts organization from programmed inspections ­ more applicable to health care organizations; and
  • Identify ways to assist health care organizations in achieving the recognition and benefits of VPP participation.

The goals of the partnership are to minimize duplications in compliance activities between the two organizations and to foster improvement in the management of safety and health issues in the health care industry, the release said.

Top


Jeffress Labels NASA as "Best of Best" For Worker Safety, Health in Federal Sector

OSHA Administrator Charles Jeffress praised the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for its safety approach in the workplace, labeling the agency as the "best of the best" in workplace safety and health in the federal sector.NASA has established a collection of actions that will enable the agency to reach the goal of being the nation's leader in safety and occupational health and in the safety of the products and services it provides. Zero mishaps in the NASA workplace are expected and achievable according to James Lloyd of NASA's safety and risk management division.NASA's safety policy stresses prevention, the review of hazards, a careful approach to waivers and deviations, encouraging the workforce to report hazards and management response, and learning from mishaps.

NASA's mentor is DuPont, an organization known for its strong safety culture. NASA was the first federal government work site approved for membership in OSHA's Voluntary Protection Program, in October 1999.

Top


State Plan States Decline Jurisdiction; OSHA Will Continue to Cover USPS Workers

OSHA will continue to cover U.S. Postal Service facilities in the 23 states that operate their own job safety enforcement programs because all of those states decline to assert jurisdiction over the USPS sites. OSHA offered the state-plan states the opportunity to amend their plans to extend their jurisdiction to USPS or to decline such jurisdiction.Postal Service facilities and nearly 1 million USPS employees were brought under OSHA jurisdiction in September 1998 when President Clinton signed the Postal Employees Safety Enhancement Act. Under the act, Congress allowed states to either assert jurisdiction over USPS sites or allow OSHA to cover the facilities. The final rule modifies each state's regulations to document that coverage of USPS workplaces and employees remains a federal OSHA responsibility.OSHA now regulates the working conditions of USPS employees as well as contract workers in official USPS mail operations, such as contract mail carriers and truck drivers transporting and unloading mail. However, agency standards do not apply to working conditions regulated by the DOT. In additional, OSHA said it regulates the working conditions of postal stations located in other public or commercial facilities.

The final rule also issued technical corrections to maritime jurisdiction in several of the states; military jurisdiction in Washington State; coverage on Indian Reservations in the State of Oregon; and information on where plan documents may be inspected.

Top


House Approves Bill to Place Defibrillators For Employees, Others in Federal Buildings

A bill that would require that Department of Health and Human Services to make recommendations and implement guidelines for the placement of defibrillators ­ devices for helping cardiac arrest victims ­ in federal building passed the House by voice vote May 23 statement. The Cardiac Arrest Survival Act is intended to improve the survival rates of individuals who experience cardiac arrest in federal buildings and to establish protections from civil liability for persons who use the devices during emergencies. Automatic external defibrillators are devices that send a jolt of electricity through the heart to restore the organ's natural rhythm.The HHS would also be required to publish recommendations on training in the use of such devices, training oversight, maintenance and testing and coordinating placement and use of AEDs with local emergency medical systems.In addition, the bill would provide "Good Samaritan" immunity to individuals who inadvertently cause harm to another through the use of a defibrillator in an emergency. The immunity from civil liability would not be available if the harm was caused by intentional misconduct or gross negligence, or if the harm was caused by a health professional acting in a professional capacity.According to the bill, more than 700 individuals die each day from sudden cardiac arrest, and two out of three of the deaths occur before the patient reaches the hospital. Estimates show that up to 30 % of these victims could be saved if they had access to immediate medical treatment, including defibrillation, the bill said.

A bill requiring the Federal Aviation Administration to make a decision regarding requiring automatic external defibrillators to be carried on commercial aircraft was signed into law in April 1998.

Top


NIOSH-UPDATE, Working women face high risks from work stress, musculoskeletal injuries, other disorders

Working women compose an increasingly large proportion of the U.S. work force. They also face high risk from job-related stress, musculoskeletal injuries, violence, and other hazards of the modern workplace, new reports by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) conclude. In many respects, the risks are higher than those for male workers.NIOSH researchers describe their findings in two articles and an editorial in the Spring 2000 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Women's Association. The editorial provides an overview of occupational health and safety hazards for working women. One of the articles addresses work stress and women. The other article, co-written by authors from NIOSH and two other organizations, examines health and safety concerns for working women in construction."Many factors heighten certain risks of work-related injury, illness, and death for female workers," said NIOSH Director Linda Rosenstock, M.D., M.P.H. "It is important to recognize these hazards and to keep all workers, women and men alike, safe on the job."Women currently make up almost half of the general U.S. work force. In the growing health care industry, where a complex range of hazards exists, including latex allergy, back injuries, and needlestick injuries, about 80 percent of the work force is female.Increasingly, women are moving into occupations once held exclusively by men, such as the construction trades. In such instances, physiological differences between women and men can translate into occupational hazards, as when women operate equipment designed for male workers of larger stature.Women workers are at disproportionately high risk for musculoskeletal injuries on the job, suffering 63 percent of all work-related repetitive motion injuries. Hazards such as radiation, glycol ethers, lead, and strenuous physical labor can affect a woman's reproductive health, including pregnancy outcomes. Violence is also a special concern for women workers. Homicide is the leading cause of job-related death for women, and women also are at increased risk of non-fatal assault.The NIOSH article "Working Women and Stress" finds that:

  • Gender-specific work stress factors, such as sex discrimination and balancing work and family demands, may have an effect on women workers above and beyond the impact of general job stressors such as job overload and skill under-utilization. Discriminatory barriers to financial and career advancement have been linked to more frequent physical and psychological symptoms and more frequent visits to the doctor.
  • The most effective way of reducing work stress is through organizational change in the workplace. This holds true for reducing work stress in female and male workers alike. Workplaces that actively discourage sexual discrimination and harassment, and promote family-friendly policies, appear to foster worker loyalty and attachment regardless of gender, studies indicate. Organizational changes effective for reducing job stress among women workers include expanding promotion and career ladders, introducing family-support programs and policies, and enforcing policies against sex discrimination and sexual harassment.

The article "Women in Construction: Occupational Health and Working Conditions," finds that:

  • Women may receive less on-the-job safety mentoring than men from supervisors and co-workers. This can create a potentially dangerous cycle in which tradeswomen are asked to do jobs for which they are not properly trained, then are injured when they do them or are seen as incompetent when they are unable to do them. Women in construction have reported harassment and verbal abuse by co-workers and isolation on the job severe enough that some women have looked for other employment.
  • Patterns of work-related construction fatalities differ for men and women. For example, women construction laborers are at higher risk than male laborers of death from motor vehicle injuries, but less likely to be at risk of death from falls, machinery related injuries, or being struck by objects. Further research is needed to determine why these differences exist.

Further information on job-related stress appears in a NIOSH document, "Stress ... At Work," DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 99-101, issued in 1999. Additional information on protecting the health and safety of women in construction appears in another NIOSH document, "Providing Safety and Health Protection for a Diverse Construction Workforce: Issues and Ideas," DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 99-140.

For copies of those documents or for other information on the health and safety of working women, call the toll-free NIOSH information number, 1-800-35-NIOSH (1-800-356-4674), or visit NIOSH on the World Wide Web at www.cdc.gov/niosh.

Top


 

Washington State Sets Ergonomics Rule

Washington State has adopted an ergonomics rule. The plan to phase the rule in over the next 2 to 5 years. The state will appoint an independent panel to ensure the rule requirements and the proposed enforcement policies are fair and consistent. In Washington State, ergonomic injuries comprise a third of all workers' compensation claims. The important features of the rule are:

  • A phase in over the next 2-5 years allowing employers to prepare for compliance. During this time, the state will develop demonstration projects. Employers that elect to participate in the demonstration projects will be give incentives such as reduced workers' compensation premium rates. The implementation plan will include a very extensive technical assistance program and training for employers, especially small businesses.
  • A panel of independent experts will oversee and review the rule, its implementation and enforcement.

For more information, contact the Washington State Department of Labor and Industry (306) 902-5400.

Top


A New Resource on Construction Safety and Health

Starting in August 2000, a new web site, the Electronic Library of Construction Safety and Health, eLCOSH, will provide a wide range of materials on construction safety and health. The goal is to improve safety and health for construction workers by making such information easier to obtain than in the past. A similar project, the National Agricultural Safety Database since 1997 has been on the Internet at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nasd/nasdhome.htmlDevelopment of eLCOSH is being supported through a grant to the Center to Protect Workers' Rights (CPWR) from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, which is part of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CPWR is the research arm of the Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO, which consists of 15 affiliate unions. Workers, contractors, researchers, and others will be able to download information from a broad range of sources - in English, Spanish, and other languages.The materials will include:

  • Pocket cards Brochures How-to manuals Chart books Newsletters Research reports Directories Training manuals and overheads Data sets Bibliographies Regulations
  • Summaries of CD-ROMs and videos (and where to get them).

Postings will be limited, with rare exceptions, to items that apply directly to construction safety and health. eLCOSH will provide links to related web sites.

Top